Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Elevate Me Later

Just ten months after waiving Ilya Bryzgalov, Anaheim GM Brian Burke is at it again, this time placing defenceman Mathieu Schneider on waivers in an effort to clear enough cap space to re-sign Teemu Selanne.

As we've already noted, not only has Burke really struggled at the draft table, he's had one helluva time trying to manage the cap situation in Anaheim (a cap situation largely of his own making).

In addition to waiving Schneider and Bryzgalov, Burke also bought-out Todd Bertuzzi, sticking the Ducks with a two-year $1.33M cap hit in the process. Yes, that's the same Todd Bertuzzi whom Burke signed to a $4M deal that forced the club to trade the promising young Andy McDonald for the whopping return of 38 games of Doug Weight and "tag cap-relief" (tagging is essentially the ability to carry or cover salary dollars across seasons).

With such a reckless approach to managing assets, can someone please remind me why Burke is the alleged front runner to be President and GM of the Leafs?

Consider this mind-boggling fact: Wade Belak and Chad Kilger were worth more than Schneider, Bertuzzi and Bryzgalov combined.

I can only hope that this latest mishandling of assets and mismanagement of cap space pushes Burke that much further out of the running for President and General Manager of my beloved Maple Leafs. If there's anything the Leafs have demonstrated it's that they don't need an outside expert to come in to help screw up their player personnel decisions.

David Foster Wallace

"Beauty is not the goal of competitive sports, but high-level sports are a prime venue for the expression of human beauty."

This has absolutely nothing to do with the Leafs or hockey...David Foster Wallace, an American author, journalist, professor and former nationally ranked tennis prodigy, committed suicide this past weekend. He was 46.

He wrote some absolutely amazing pieces, I'd encourage you to check them out:

The Weasel, Twelve Monkeys And The Shrub: Seven Days In The Life Of The Late, Great John McCain. Rolling Stone Magazine, April 2000.

Shipping Out: On the (nearly lethal) Comforts of a Luxury Cruise. Harper's Magazine, January 1996.

Federer as Religious Experience. New York Times, September 2006

The Nature of the Fun. Fiction Writer Magazine, September 1998

Monday, September 15, 2008

This Little Light of Mine

Tim Wharnsby’s recent Globe and Mail article on the Leafs efforts to recruit new fans is an interesting read and it garnered a pretty interesting reaction from Old Guys in Blue and White.

Personally, I found it to be a bit of a tease. There's some fascinating information lurking in there, but unfortunately we only get a glimpse.

In 50 words or less: on the ticket side of things, the Leafs are laughing all the way to the bank; in terms of longitudinal brand positioning, things aren't so rosy. Or in plain language: the number of “die-hard” Leaf fans declined by 17% last year (making me question if the respondents actually understood what the term "die-hard" meant.)

Growing the Game

Given the decline in their hardcore base, the Leafs have come out and admitted that they need to do a better job in their relationship with Leaf fans including improving access, building a better quality product, providing exceptional service and rewarding fan loyalty.

MLSE looked at their data and concluded that the best way to do this is by working to grow the game of hockey at the grass roots level.

Not having access to the Leafs' research, I find it interesting that this is the conclusion MLSE came to.

Looking at external data, I don't see that that youth participation=fan. In fact, if one looks at youth participation rates by sport, there doesn't seem to be much, if any, correlation between actual participation and eventual fan support.

2007 Youth Sport Participation1

Bowling 43.5 million
Basketball 24.1
Baseball 14.0
Soccer, 13.8
Tennis 12.3
Darts 12.1
Volleyball 12.0
Softball 10.0
Football 9.2
Hockey 2.1

Bowling and soccer have much higher youth participation rates than hockey and neither sport has done much in terms of creating a major North American television following, professional league, or challenging the big 3 (NFL, NBA, MLB).

Basketball is the number two participation sport, but the NBA is having tougher attendance issues than the NHL and their TV numbers are also in trouble.

Football is undoubtedly the king of pro sports at the moment with franchises worth an unprecedented $1 billion each, yet youth participation rates for football exceed only those of hockey.

On the other side, I'm not sure how many fans of ultimate fighting and all of its spin offs grew up getting the tar kicked out of them down at the local cage/ring or whatever the heck you call that thing they fight in. Same goes for NASCAR – I don’t recall any stories of Southern kids with supped-up cars driving around all afternoon in circles…yet these sports have huge followings and are (strangely) popular.

I think it's great that the Leafs want to help grow minor hockey, I'm just not sure that it's going to translate into any sort of bump in their fan base.

Are the Leafs Missing Two Major Opportunities?

Participation in minor hockey across the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) may be in decline, but there is one area where it is absolutely thriving: women's hockey.

According to the IIHF, in 2004 Canada had 62,640 registered female players and by 2007 the number had grown to 73,791.

The NCAA reports that there has been a 257% increase in participation in women's hockey over the last 10 years.

It could just be an omission, but I'd love to know what the Leafs are doing to build on this success story of women's increasing participation in this great sport.

Over 50% of Toronto's residents are foreign born and each year approximately 45% of all new immigrants to Canada settle in the GTA2. The good news is, the Leafs home market is still growing. What I'd love to know is what the Leafs are doing to reach out to new Canadians, especially the South-Asian community (13.5% of Toronto's population) and the Chinese (9.6% of Toronto's population).

It makes far more sense to me to go after these groups, which are growing rapidly, than it does to prop-up or support groups that are in decline, built on exclusionary pricing and are likely to yield a Habs or Sens fan as a die-hard Leaf fan.


It's always intriguing to get even the briefest insight into the thoughts and approaches of MLSE and I hope to see more of this stuff from Wharnsby.

So here's the other questions I'd love to have answers to...

Anselmi mentioned that the Leafs need to improve their web-presence and use of cell phone tech to reach out to younger fans. There's an interesting link at Kuklas Korner today regarding a Pittsburgh Post-Gazette piece about the new on-line toys that will be part of the NHL's online game coverage.

  • I wonder what the Leafs will be doing to promote these new stats and the new "in-game" on-line experience.
  • I've complained about the mess the NHL has made of the team web-sites before, but I'd really love to know just what the Leafs can do with their web-site, and what the NHL-NYR lawsuit means for the Leafs and for the League.
  • I'd also love an enterprising reporter or sports editor out there to look at what CBS has been able to do with their Final Four web-packages and see what lessons, if any, can be applied to the NHL.
I'm a bit of a research/ public polling junkie and as such, I would love to get my hands on the data that Anselmi mentioned to Wharnsby. It would be fascinating to know:

  1. Preference for the Leafs in the GTA compared to other competing entertainment options - NFL, CFL, Opera, Theatre, NBA, the club district, concerts, etc.
  2. How Leaf fan support compares to fan support for NHL franchises in other Canadian cities
  3. The Leafs are a national brand – where in Canada is their fan base growing, where is it weakening, where is it stagnant?
  4. What are the year over year trend rates for questions 1, 2 and 3? Does the data reveal any type of relationship between the trend-lines and on-ice performance?
  5. How do the Leafs resonate with non-traditional fan bases (women; visible minorities)
  6. Did those fans that self-identified as “die-hards” play minor hockey growing up? What are the other common demographic features of the “die-hard” group?
  7. Are there any commonalities that can be seen in the 17% who no longer classified themselves as die-hards?
(I don't mean to suggest that Wharnsby didn't ask any of these questions or request any of this data, but this stuff above is the real meat of the matter...)

Thursday, September 11, 2008

29 Years Later

Leafs Win! When I was a boy, the Toronto Maple Leafs and McClelland and Stewart (don’t look for them, they’re not there anymore) published a cloth cover book on the upcoming 1979-80 Leafs' season.

I read that book so many times the spine is broken, the pages are frayed and the dust jacket is a nothing but a long-lost memory.

It was published at a time of real optimism for the Leafs. The team was just two years removed from their playoff upset over the New York Islanders and, even though they had gone down four straight to the dreaded Montreal Canadiens in the Quarter Finals, game 3 had gone to double OT and game 4 was lost in OT on a questionable call against Dave “Tiger” Williams.

This was a time when Sittler still wore the C, MacDonald patrolled his wing, an optimistic Ron Wilson started the season on IR and a porn ‘stached Palmateer protected the pipes.

popcorn kid
As thoughts turn to this year’s training camp with its new coaches and new rosters, I couldn’t help but be reminded of this book and its in-depth player profiles including expectations for the 79-80 season and a day-by-day prĂ©cis of the Leafs training camp.

Now, I’m not suggesting this year’s Leaf season will have any resemblance to that horrible one 30 years ago.

First of all, the year ahead for the 2008-09 Leafs certainly isn’t starting off with the same patina of optimism. Secondly, I seriously doubt the Leafs could hit the same low points as that fateful year that saw the MacDonald trade, Sittler ripping off his C and the start of a twelve year run of the team posting a losing record (yeah, you read that right – the Leafs were under .500 for twelve straight seasons: 1979-80 to 1992-93. Keep that in mind when the media wring their hands over the past three years.).

That summer also saw Ballard and Imlach pursue legal action all the way to the Ontario Supreme court in an effort to keep Sittler and Palmateer from participating in Showdown - a televised skills competition between NHL players. (There's a great collection of Showdown videos from the CBC archives here. Man I LOVED this show as a kid.)

With that caveat out of the way and in anticipation of the Leafs training camp to come, I thought I’d go back through one of my favourite childhood books, violate all sorts of copyright laws, scan a few photos, and have a look at some interesting quotes, thoughts and anecdotes from the Leafs 29 years ago this September…

The World From on High: An Interview with Harold Ballard

The book begins with a long, very wide-ranging interview between Time Magazine reporter John Gault and Harold Ballard, including a lengthy discussion between Gault and Ballard on the Neilson firing, re-hiring (the infamous paper bag incident). I promise I’ll post that whole exchange soon.

There are some interesting echoes in this interview - meddling owners, bad trades and the need for better scouting, as captured in the exchange below:

John Gault: Who’s been traded away, in the past five years, say, that you wish you had back?
Harold Ballard: Well, Rick Kehoe for instance, who went to Pittsburgh. Carlyle should have been kept here. And I think that probably Jack Valiquette should have stayed.

Gault: The return on players you’ve sent to other teams hasn’t been that great in the past while, has it?
Ballard: No. We’ve traded away some pretty good hockey players.

Gault: Yes, and it could be argued that you didn’t exactly get your return on your dollars
Ballard: You don’t have to argue about it, it’s a fact.

Gault: Why?
Ballard: I don’t think our scouting system was that good or they wouldn’t have agreed to make those trades. Now you’ve said that I try to run everything. I don’t. When they were going to make a deal, I’d say to [former GM Jim] Gregory ‘Are you sure you’re going to do it?’ You see, they would have gotten rid of Turnbull if I hadn’t asserted myself last year and stopped it. Roger and Gregory wanted to get rid of Turnbull and I wouldn’t allow it. He couldn’t get along with the coach, so the coach wanted to get rid of him. As a matter of fact, Roger was quite adamant about it and I said: ‘Look, if he’s going to go, you’re going to go to.’ It was that bad.

Gault: I doubt that Neilson would have argued that Turnbull wasn’t a good hockey player
Ballard: Well he did. He had these ‘points’ He was a great guy with those replays, those little pictures you know. And he used to pick out all the bad things Turnbull did, but he didn’t pick out many good things...

I love that Ballard seems totally put off by Neilson’s use of video replay, or as he calls it: “those little pictures.”

A Guide to the Opposition

The late Frank Orr, formerly of the Toronto Star, provides an overview of all 20 NHL teams the Leafs would face in 1979-80, including the four new WHA teams that joined the NHL: Edmonton, Quebec, Hartford and Winnipeg.

Here are a few of the highlights:

The Sabres are trying something new with a “coaching staff” approach - Scotty Bowman hired Roger Neilson and Jim Roberts as Assistant Coaches. Don Cherry said of the approach: “Scotty wants assistants so he’ll have someone to blame if something goes wrong.” Bowman’s take: “I agree with the Europeans. They can’t understand why NHL teams have figured one coach could do the job. It’s just too complex for that now.”

1979-80 was the first season for the Oilers and they sold 14,600 season tickets within 11 days of tickets going on sale. Coach Glen Sather says he has his highest hopes for young Swedish forward Bengt Gustavsson [who never played a game for the Oilers, the Capitals claimed him at the expansion draft in June, 1979.]

The Whalers roster included a 51 year old Gordie Howe and coach Don Blackburn says he wants to experiment with moving left-wing Mark Howe (42-23-65 in 1978) back to defence.

The New York Islanders (that season’s Stanley Cup champs) only had one skater over 28 on their roster and their entire core (Trottier, Bossy, Gillies, Potvin, etc.) were under 25.

The Penguins were having attendance problems and were facing red ink.

In the 1970s, free agents were anything but. The Red Wings signed “Free Agent” goaltender Rogie Vachon from the LA Kings and had to compensate the Kings for the signing. The teams couldn’t agree on fair compensation and the Kings asked for, and were awarded, Dale McCourt – the Wings’ leading rookie scorer. McCourt refused to report to LA and the dispute ended up in the US courts. The lower court upheld the original compensation. McCourt and the Wings appealed the decision, but before a second court date was set, the Wings and Kings agreed to an alternate compensation and McCourt was “dealt” back to the Wings.

The Flyers got a first round pick for what has to be the oddest named twosome ever dealt: Orest Kindrachuk and Ross Lonsberry.

Training Camp September, 1979

Leaf veterans arrived in camp with a new coach (Floyd Smith) and a new GM (Punch Imlach) as GM Jim Gregory and Coach Roger Neilson were both fired over the summer.

When Nielson returned to the Gardens as the assistant coach of the Sabres for a pre-season game, the Leafs refused to let him sit in the press box. Imlach said, "If Neilson wants to coach, let him coach from behind the bench. He won't be able to do it from our press box." (You stay classy Imlach!)

Looking to add some grit to the line-up, Imlach offered Jim Dorey a try-out with the Leafs. Ten years earlier, Dorey set an NHL record with nine penalties - four minors, two majors, two 10 minute misconducts and a game misconduct - in just two periods of play. [After being cut by the Leafs, Dorey would go on to play 32 games that year for the Nordiques and then call it a career.]

The Leafs played 12 exhibition games including matches in Moncton, NB; Ottawa, ON, Kitchener, ON; and against the Canadian Olympic team in Calgary (the Leafs lost to the Olympians 6-5, Lanny had a hat-trick. Apparently the Leafs had trouble with the Olympians speed. And no, I didn't just make that up...)

The Leafs played the Habs in game 11 of their pre-season and actually won. It was the first time the Leafs had beaten Montreal in 25 straight meetings. The Leafs hadn't beaten Montreal in an exhibition, regular season or playoff game since November 1, 1976.

Future Washington Capitals coach Bruce Budreau was amongst the Leafs last cuts at camp, getting sent to Moncton on day 17.

Interesting to note that this club would produce at least four NHL coaches in Quennville, Anderson, Boudreau and Ron Wilson (and one cottage-country bar owner in Walt McKechnie).

Money quotes:

"I guess having a new coach always creates a little feeling of unrest because you wonder about the style of hockey he'll want the team to use and how you'll fit into it." - Ron Wilson.

"There are some holes in our team, aren't there?" - Floyd Smith

The Players

off to Colorado

Each of the 24 Leafs who made the team out of training camp are profiled at the end of the book. It's the standard 20 questions format - why hockey, what would you be doing if you weren't in the NHL, superstitions, activities away from the rink, personal goals...Here's a look at the highlights:

"I like the hours. It's not a nine to five job. You have the summers off to do what you want and, of course, the money isn't bad." - John Anderson on the Pros and Cons of Sports Celebrity.

"I would have liked to get into a veterinary line of work or work with wildlife" - Dan Maloney on alternate career prospects.

"I never set personal goals for myself; the only goal is the Stanley Cup. When you start setting personal goals you're putting pressure on yourself and that kind of pressure you don't need. When I get my first goal I'll go for number two and so on. You take whatever comes. Winning the Stanley Cup and playing international hockey: that's the ultimate, to play for your country. I've already done one and, hopefully, befoer the end of my career, I'll accomplish the other." - Lanny MacDonald

"Amityville Horror and Penthouse are favourites." - Joel Quennville on what he likes to read.

"Mr. Ballard. Yeah, I'm serious." - Dave "Tiger" Williams on his favourite opponent

"I'll just play until I stop enjoying it. If I don't play a lot this year or next year I may hang up the game because it's no fun sitting on the bench." - Ron Wilson In 29 Years, I'll be in charge

Monday, September 08, 2008

Breaking News from 2005

The Leafs need to change the culture in their locker room.

That's the latest story line from the media horde that covers the Leafs:

Vesa Toskala tells the National Post that he's "not surprised" at the changes in the room.

Ken Campbell of the Hockey News goes public with a very revealing, albeit five or six year-old quote from Bryan McCabe ("in one ear and out the other...”)

Ron Wilson says the Leafs have lacked leadership in the room for the last three seasons.

David Shoalts asks a few Leafs to comment on Wilson's lack of leadership allegations and offers this tidbit to close out his piece:

When former GM John Ferguson let both Roberts and Nieuwendyk leave as free agents, the team's leadership suffered. Four years later, the Leafs are still looking for a solution.
This is all great to know, but here's my (rhetorical) question to the army of journalists that cover the Leafs:

Where the hell have you been for the past three seasons and why is this only making the news now?

Seriously, can someone get Ken Campbell to tell us why he waited five+ years to report that juicy McCabe quote? Or perhaps Dreger can explain why his inside sources didn't tell him about the desperate need for change down at the ACC (apparently they were too busy telling Dreger that a Tucker buy-out wouldn't make sense and that Ron Wilson wasn't coming to Toronto).

Isn't the fact that the locker room was a country club (Or is it a lack of leadership? Or bad apples?) the type of information that trained professionals with primary sources and locker room access are paid to gather and report on?

In the end, it all comes down to access and favour.

If a sports repoter tells us what's really going on, he or she will lose access. And if they lose access, they won't be able to collect all those great stories that they can't tell us about.

Wednesday, September 03, 2008

Cliff Fletcher's Asset Management

A look at Cliff Fletcher's transacations as GM of the Toronto Maple Leafs

Picks Acquired
2008 – 2nd (PIT for Gill)
2008 – 3rd (FLA for Kilger)
2008 – 5th (FLA for Belak)
2008 – 5th (PIT for Gill)

Picks Traded
2008 – 3rd (TOR) to NYI for Schenn
2008 – 3rd (FLA) to STL for Mayers
2008 – 5th (TOR) to MTL for Grabovski
2009 - 2nd (TOR) to NYI for Schenn
2009 - 5th (PIT) to NYR for Hollweg
2010 - 2nd (TOR) to MTL for Grabovski
2010 - 4th (TOR) to FLA for Mike Van Ryn

Net Picks traded
2nd
3rd
4th

Net Picks Gained
None

Toronto Maple Leaf Draft Picks Remaining

2009 NHL Draft
1st (TOR)
2nd NO PICK: (NYI for Schenn)
3rd (TOR)
4th NO PICK: (SJ for Toskala, traded by JFJ)
5th (TOR)
6th (TOR)
7th (TOR)

2010 NHL Draft
1st (TOR)
2nd NO PICK: (MTL for Grabovski)
3rd (TOR)
4th NO PICK: (FLA for Van Ryn)
5th (TOR)
6th (TOR)
7th (TOR)


UFAs
Niklas Hagman $3M/4yrs.
Jeff Finger $3.5M/4yrs.
Curtis Joseph $700K/1 yr.
Jonas Frogren (contact in dispute)
Josef Boumidienne (two-way deal)


Cap Implications

Tucker -$4.0M total ($1.0M/year until 2013 - if you have a baby this Leaf season, your child will be in Junior Kindergarten when this salary comes off the books)

Raycroft -$1.266M total ($533K in 2008-09; $733K in 2009-2010)

McCabe +$11.45M total ($2.85M in 2008-09 and 2009-10; $5.75M in 2010-11)


Cheap Editorializing

McCabe and a 4th for Van Ryn: apparently I'm one of three members of Leafs nation that doesn't like this deal. I'll let Alan Ryder 'splain why. (I also have a completely irrational fear that Van Ryn will get hurt 10 days before the trade deadline making him unmovable in 2009).

Tucker (waived) - Mayers (acquired for a 3rd round pick): an aging grinder, former PP sniper now in decline swapped out for an aging grinder PK specialist who's allegedly not in decline.

Wellwood (waived) - Grabovski (acquired for a 2nd and 5th round pick): a small, soft, unproven second line centre waived to make room for a small, soft unproven second line centre.

Belak (traded for a 5th) - Holwegg (acquired for 5th) - Meh. If Holwegg plays more than 35 games something is seriously amiss in the land of alleged young player development.

Tuesday, September 02, 2008

Something I Learned Today

The world always makes the assumption that the exposure of an error is identical with the discovery of the truth - that error and truth are simply opposite. They are nothing of the sort. What the world turns to, when it has been cured of one error, is usually simply another error, and maybe one worse than the first one. - H.L. Mencken

When it comes to going public with bad news, there are two types of organizations:

  1. Those that deal with it in an open and transparent manner – Tylenol is the oft-cited prototype in this camp and, much more recently, Maple Leaf Meats have shown the merit of being open, honest and accountable.
  2. Those who leak, bury or misdirect the news in an effort to control the message.

I’d say my beloved Toronto Maple Leafs usually fall into slot #2.

And what are some of the best tactics to get in front of a bad news story?

  1. Release it late on the Friday of a long-weekend;
  2. Release it when there’s a lot of other bad news in the system; and/or
  3. Leak the bad news early and leak it often – by the time the news becomes official or confirmed, most people will have moved through the five stages of grief from anger to acceptance.
When it comes to the Bryan McCabe trade, the Leafs have gone for door number 3 like the RIAA going after a 12 year old with a USB drive full of Jonas Brothers mp3s and the outcome, strangely, seems to be acceptance.

What’s that Smell?

The first time I went to Kamloops I was visiting an old friend who had just gotten engaged.

Kamloops stunk. Figuratively and literally.

The town is essentially a bowl built around a pulp mill. The scent of reduced sulphurs permeates everything.

The first few days I was in town, I kept asking my friend how he could live in a place that, um, stank. I don't mean to be cruel, but everything was tinted with the malodorous combination of cabbage and rotten eggs.

But then a strange thing happened: the smell seemed to go away. I no longer spent my days with a crinkled nose and worried brow wondering how people live among such a paralyzing stink.

Except the smell never went away.

The town still stunk of the by-products of supplying the world with 477,000 tonnes of pulp related products.

I just lost my ability to detect the stench.

Scientists call this phenomena olfactory adaptation or olfactory fatigue. Our nervous systems are programmed to automatically desensitize to certain stimuli so that we are not overloaded. For example, our skin doesn't constantly sense our clothing and our noses eventually get used to the gagging stink of pulp.

By turning down a response to certain or constant stimuli our bodies are better able to recognize and respond to new stimuli/possible threats.

If you've made it this far and are still reading, you may be asking yourself what pulp products, bad odours and olfactory adaptation have to do with the Leafs.

Stick with me here...

In Leaf Land it's not Pulp, it’s the Stench of Failure

I wonder if maybe Leafs Nation is undergoing a massive case of olfactory adaptation.

That we've become so used to the smell in these parts that they don't notice it anymore.

Slam McCabe all you want. Link to the youtube compilation videos of his various gaffes. Mock his haircuts, goofy faces and penchant for taking dumb penalties.

Go ahead and cringe at the burden of his no-movement clause.

But then step back and look at the numbers.

Three out of the last five seasons, McCabe was among the top 10 in scoring by a defenseman; three times he finished in the top three for goals.

Believe it or not, McCabe placed third in Norris trophy voting in 2004 and ninth in 2006.

He cracked the taxi squad for the 2006 Canadian Olympic squad. Bitch and moan all you want that he wasn’t in the top six on that club, but to be on the Canadian Olympic team is to be among some pretty elite company.

Despite all of these accomplishments and accolades, McCabe’s no-movement clause has allegedly so diminished his value that the Leafs had to include a draft pick in order to complete the deal.

Bottom line: the return for a number 2 d-man, power play quarterback, who can log 20+ minutes a night, who has a history of finishing in the top 10 in scoring (and who occasionally scores in the wrong net) is nothing more than a 3-4 d-man who’s recovering from multiple wrist surgeries.

And the Leafs had to throw in a 4th round pick to get the deal done.

As Steve points out in his latest entry, and as I posted earlier this summer, the trade does nothing to solve the Leafs' log-jam on D where they're approaching the season with nine NHL caliber defencemen (10 if you think Schenn might get more than a cup of coffee with the big club).

Anyone that hasn't been living under a rock can tell you that the Leafs don't need more D; they don't need cap flexibility; they don't need to shed more draft picks.

And yet, that's what they get for a top pairing d-man.

The Toronto Maple Leafs: A Rich History of Horrible Asset Management

I cannot believe that I’m going to cite Damien Cox here, but he has a point (ick). The Leafs have moved a pretty big chunk of talent/assets off their roster in the last few years. Consider:
  • Belfour
  • Domi
  • Tucker
  • Wellwood
  • Rask===>Raycroft (should have been ===>ECHL but for the Avs)
  • McCabe
All gone for nothing more than Mike Van Ryn and a series of lingering cap hits.

If shedding all of those players for nothing weren't bad enough, Fletcher has spent even more assets to spackle over the same holes:
  • Mayers for a third round pick
  • Grabovski for a second round pick
  • Schenn for a second and third round pick
  • a Fourth round pick to kiss McCabe goodbye
Changing the Culture: Buying High and Selling Low

I understand that management is trying to change the so-called culture of this club.

They gassed the coach (could only talk a good game), waived Wellwood (uncommitted, soft); bought-out Tucker (washed-up, psychopathic) and bought-out Raycroft (glove hand not good enough for mite T-ball).

But I’d argue that the real cultural change is far more urgently needed in the executive corridors of MLSE than in the locker room.

When Fletcher first came back to the Leafs, it was with a real sense of confidence. I loved his candid approach to assessing the team. I loved the moves he made at the trade deadline. I thought PM had to go and Wilson was a pretty solid replacement.

And then things regressed back to the norm. This team has a long twisted tradition of buying high and selling low, a philosophy that, once again, has stained all of Fletcher’s moves this summer.

The Leafs' story remains too many assets out the door with too little to show for it.

And the McCabe trade is just one more deal where the Leafs come out on the losing end.

Fletcher said last Tuesday: "Trying to build a team can't be fast-tracked."

He may be right, but he's demonstrating that it sure can be chronically mismanaged.